Canning Vale vs Edgewater
Property investment comparison - Canning Vale, WA 6155 vs Edgewater, WA 6027
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Canning Vale wins 2, Edgewater wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Canning Vale | Edgewater |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.2M | $1.2M |
| Median unit price | $725K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.95% | 3.55% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.30% | 4.16% |
| 1-year house growth | +21.8%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.2% | 0.6% |
| Population | 34,504 | 4,657 |
Canning Vale vs Edgewater: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.2M in Canning Vale and $1.2M in Edgewater, so Edgewater is the cheaper entry point, with Canning Vale houses about 2% dearer.
On cash flow, Canning Vale leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.95%, compared with 3.55% in Edgewater, a gap of 0.40 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Edgewater and 1.2% in Canning Vale, so landlords in Edgewater face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Canning Vale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 34,504 against 4,657, roughly 7 times the size of Edgewater; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Canning Vale for rental income, Edgewater for a lower purchase price, Edgewater for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison