Skip to main content

Cannon Valley vs Scarborough

Property investment comparison - Cannon Valley, QLD 4800 vs Scarborough, QLD 4020

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cannon Valley wins 1, Scarborough wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCannon ValleyScarborough
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$1.1M-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.79%-
Gross rental yield (units)1.92%-
1-year house growth+6.3%estimate+18.9%
3-year house growth-+32.1%
Vacancy rate0.3%1.6%
Population1,1319,178

Cannon Valley vs Scarborough: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.2M in Cannon Valley and $1.2M in Scarborough, so Scarborough is the cheaper entry point.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.3% in Cannon Valley (an estimate) and +18.9% in Scarborough, so recent momentum favours Scarborough, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Cannon Valley and 1.6% in Scarborough, so landlords in Cannon Valley face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Scarborough is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,178 against 1,131, roughly 8 times the size of Cannon Valley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Scarborough for a lower purchase price, Scarborough for recent price momentum, Cannon Valley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison