Skip to main content

Canterbury vs Parma

Property investment comparison - Canterbury, NSW 2193 vs Parma, NSW 2540

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Canterbury wins 3, Parma wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCanterburyParma
Median house price$2.1M$2.1M
Median unit price$755K$625K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.17%1.48%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.64%
1-year house growth+6.7%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.7%2.3%
Population9,430167

Canterbury vs Parma: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.1M in Canterbury and $2.1M in Parma, so Canterbury is the cheaper entry point, with Parma houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Canterbury sits at a median of $755K against $625K in Parma, which makes Parma the more affordable unit market and Canterbury the pricier one.

On cash flow, Canterbury leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.17%, compared with 1.48% in Parma, a gap of 0.69 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.7% in Canterbury and 2.3% in Parma, so landlords in Canterbury face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Canterbury is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,430 against 167, roughly 56 times the size of Parma; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Canterbury for rental income, Canterbury for a lower purchase price, Canterbury for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison