Skip to main content

Canterbury vs Pennant Hills

Property investment comparison - Canterbury, NSW 2193 vs Pennant Hills, NSW 2120

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Canterbury wins 2, Pennant Hills wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCanterburyPennant Hills
Median house price$2.1M$2.1M
Median unit price$755K$730K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.17%-
Gross rental yield (units)--
1-year house growth+6.7%estimate-6.1%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.7%1.9%
Population9,4307,588

Canterbury vs Pennant Hills: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.1M in Canterbury and $2.1M in Pennant Hills, so Pennant Hills is the cheaper entry point, with Canterbury houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Canterbury sits at a median of $755K against $730K in Pennant Hills, which makes Pennant Hills the more affordable unit market and Canterbury the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.7% in Canterbury (an estimate) and -6.1% in Pennant Hills (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Canterbury, while Pennant Hills went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.7% in Canterbury and 1.9% in Pennant Hills, so landlords in Canterbury face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Canterbury is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,430 against 7,588, larger than Pennant Hills; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Pennant Hills for a lower purchase price, Canterbury for recent price momentum, Canterbury for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison