Canton Beach vs Greta
Property investment comparison - Canton Beach, NSW 2263 vs Greta, NSW 2334
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Canton Beach wins 1, Greta wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Canton Beach | Greta |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $840K | $840K |
| Median unit price | $480K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 4.04% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.72% | 4.90% |
| 1-year house growth | +10.4%estimate | +20.6% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +30.3% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.1% | 3.2% |
| Population | 1,202 | 3,349 |
Canton Beach vs Greta: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $840K in Canton Beach and $840K in Greta.
Over the past year house prices moved +10.4% in Canton Beach (an estimate) and +20.6% in Greta, so recent momentum favours Greta, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Canton Beach and 3.2% in Greta, so landlords in Canton Beach face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Greta is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,349 against 1,202, roughly 2.8 times the size of Canton Beach; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Greta for recent price momentum, Canton Beach for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison