Skip to main content

Capalaba vs Deagon

Property investment comparison - Capalaba, QLD 4157 vs Deagon, QLD 4017

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Capalaba wins 1, Deagon wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCapalabaDeagon
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$765K$340K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.24%
Gross rental yield (units)-6.04%
1-year house growth+15.9%-
3-year house growth+45.9%+45.7%
Vacancy rate1.3%0.8%
Population18,0023,773

Capalaba vs Deagon: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Capalaba and $1.1M in Deagon, so Deagon is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Capalaba sits at a median of $765K against $340K in Deagon, which makes Deagon the more affordable unit market and Capalaba the pricier one.

Looking back three years, Capalaba houses are +45.9% and Deagon houses +45.7%, so Capalaba has compounded faster than Deagon over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Deagon and 1.3% in Capalaba, so landlords in Deagon face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Capalaba is the bigger suburb, with a population of 18,002 against 3,773, roughly 4.8 times the size of Deagon; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Deagon for a lower purchase price, Deagon for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison