Capel Sound vs Timmering
Property investment comparison - Capel Sound, VIC 3940 vs Timmering, VIC 3561
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Capel Sound wins 2, Timmering wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Capel Sound | Timmering |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $745K | $745K |
| Median unit price | $640K | $360K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.00% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.53% | 4.37% |
| 1-year house growth | -2.7% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +0.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.7% | 2.8% |
| Population | 5,246 | 90 |
Capel Sound vs Timmering: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $745K in Capel Sound and $745K in Timmering.
For units, Capel Sound sits at a median of $640K against $360K in Timmering, which makes Timmering the more affordable unit market and Capel Sound the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 1.7% in Capel Sound and 2.8% in Timmering, so landlords in Capel Sound face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Capel Sound is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,246 against 90, roughly 58 times the size of Timmering; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Capel Sound for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison