Skip to main content

Cardiff South vs Lake Heights

Property investment comparison - Cardiff South, NSW 2285 vs Lake Heights, NSW 2502

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cardiff South wins 2, Lake Heights wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCardiff SouthLake Heights
Median house price$930K$925K
Median unit price-$790K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.84%
Gross rental yield (units)4.40%-
1-year house growth+11.3%+4.7%
3-year house growth+33.8%+20.0%
Vacancy rate2.3%2.0%
Population2,9314,105

Cardiff South vs Lake Heights: what the numbers say

The median house price is $930K in Cardiff South and $925K in Lake Heights, so Lake Heights is the cheaper entry point, with Cardiff South houses about 1% dearer.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.3% in Cardiff South and +4.7% in Lake Heights, so recent momentum favours Cardiff South, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Cardiff South houses are +33.8% and Lake Heights houses +20.0%, so Cardiff South has compounded faster than Lake Heights over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 2.0% in Lake Heights and 2.3% in Cardiff South, so landlords in Lake Heights face less competition for tenants.

Lake Heights is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,105 against 2,931, larger than Cardiff South; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Lake Heights for a lower purchase price, Cardiff South for recent price momentum, Lake Heights for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison