Skip to main content

Cardup vs Iluka

Property investment comparison - Cardup, WA 6122 vs Iluka, WA 6028

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cardup wins 2, Iluka wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCardupIluka
Median house price$1.7M$1.7M
Median unit price$485K$975K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.35%3.63%
Gross rental yield (units)3.76%4.21%
1-year house growth+20.1%estimate+13.3%
3-year house growth-+55.4%
Vacancy rate4.3%4.1%
Population1,1635,669

Cardup vs Iluka: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.7M in Cardup and $1.7M in Iluka, so Iluka is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Cardup sits at a median of $485K against $975K in Iluka, which makes Cardup the more affordable unit market and Iluka the pricier one.

On cash flow, Iluka leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.63%, compared with 2.35% in Cardup, a gap of 1.28 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +20.1% in Cardup (an estimate) and +13.3% in Iluka, so recent momentum favours Cardup, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 4.1% in Iluka and 4.3% in Cardup, so landlords in Iluka face less competition for tenants.

Iluka is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,669 against 1,163, roughly 4.9 times the size of Cardup; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Iluka for rental income, Iluka for a lower purchase price, Cardup for recent price momentum, Iluka for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison