Skip to main content

Cardup vs Karrinyup

Property investment comparison - Cardup, WA 6122 vs Karrinyup, WA 6018

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cardup wins 1, Karrinyup wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCardupKarrinyup
Median house price$1.7M$1.7M
Median unit price$485K-
Gross rental yield (houses)2.35%3.06%
Gross rental yield (units)3.76%-
1-year house growth+20.1%estimate+12.0%
3-year house growth-+47.8%
Vacancy rate4.3%1.8%
Population1,1639,886

Cardup vs Karrinyup: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.7M in Cardup and $1.7M in Karrinyup, so Karrinyup is the cheaper entry point.

On cash flow, Karrinyup leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.06%, compared with 2.35% in Cardup, a gap of 0.71 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +20.1% in Cardup (an estimate) and +12.0% in Karrinyup, so recent momentum favours Cardup, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Karrinyup and 4.3% in Cardup, so landlords in Karrinyup face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Karrinyup is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,886 against 1,163, roughly 9 times the size of Cardup; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Karrinyup for rental income, Karrinyup for a lower purchase price, Cardup for recent price momentum, Karrinyup for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison