Skip to main content

Carindale vs Norman Park

Property investment comparison - Carindale, QLD 4152 vs Norman Park, QLD 4170

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Carindale wins 3, Norman Park wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCarindaleNorman Park
Median house price$1.8M$1.8M
Median unit price$980K$890K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.70%
Gross rental yield (units)--
1-year house growth+10.4%+12.3%
3-year house growth+36.5%+20.7%
Vacancy rate1.4%1.4%
Population16,5356,842

Carindale vs Norman Park: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.8M in Carindale and $1.8M in Norman Park, so Carindale is the cheaper entry point, with Norman Park houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Carindale sits at a median of $980K against $890K in Norman Park, which makes Norman Park the more affordable unit market and Carindale the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.4% in Carindale and +12.3% in Norman Park, so recent momentum favours Norman Park, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Carindale houses are +36.5% and Norman Park houses +20.7%, so Carindale has compounded faster than Norman Park over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.4%.

Carindale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 16,535 against 6,842, roughly 2.4 times the size of Norman Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Carindale for a lower purchase price, Norman Park for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison