Caringbah vs Carrick
Property investment comparison - Caringbah, NSW 2229 vs Carrick, NSW 2580
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Caringbah wins 2, Carrick wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Caringbah | Carrick |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2M | $2.0M |
| Median unit price | $905K | $565K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.47% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.10% | 4.38% |
| 1-year house growth | +4.0% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +18.5% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.7% | 1.2% |
| Population | 12,575 | 164 |
Caringbah vs Carrick: what the numbers say
The median house price is $2M in Caringbah and $2.0M in Carrick, so Caringbah is the cheaper entry point.
For units, Caringbah sits at a median of $905K against $565K in Carrick, which makes Carrick the more affordable unit market and Caringbah the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Caringbah and 1.2% in Carrick, so landlords in Caringbah face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Caringbah is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,575 against 164, roughly 77 times the size of Carrick; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Caringbah for a lower purchase price, Caringbah for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison