Skip to main content

Caringbah vs Kyeemagh

Property investment comparison - Caringbah, NSW 2229 vs Kyeemagh, NSW 2216

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Caringbah wins 2, Kyeemagh wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCaringbahKyeemagh
Median house price$2M$2M
Median unit price$905K$765K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.47%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.10%5.27%
1-year house growth+4.0%-4.7%estimate
3-year house growth+18.5%-
Vacancy rate0.7%3.8%
Population12,575935

Caringbah vs Kyeemagh: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $2M in Caringbah and $2M in Kyeemagh.

For units, Caringbah sits at a median of $905K against $765K in Kyeemagh, which makes Kyeemagh the more affordable unit market and Caringbah the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +4.0% in Caringbah and -4.7% in Kyeemagh (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Caringbah, while Kyeemagh went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Caringbah and 3.8% in Kyeemagh, so landlords in Caringbah face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Caringbah is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,575 against 935, roughly 13 times the size of Kyeemagh; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Caringbah for recent price momentum, Caringbah for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison