Skip to main content

Caringbah South vs Hurlstone Park

Property investment comparison - Caringbah South, NSW 2229 vs Hurlstone Park, NSW 2193

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Caringbah South wins 1, Hurlstone Park wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCaringbah SouthHurlstone Park
Median house price$2.5M$2.5M
Median unit price-$845K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.89%2.22%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.25%
1-year house growth+2.4%estimate+7.5%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.1%0.9%
Population13,1685,001

Caringbah South vs Hurlstone Park: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $2.5M in Caringbah South and $2.5M in Hurlstone Park.

On cash flow, Caringbah South leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.89%, compared with 2.22% in Hurlstone Park, a gap of 0.67 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +2.4% in Caringbah South (an estimate) and +7.5% in Hurlstone Park (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Hurlstone Park, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Hurlstone Park and 2.1% in Caringbah South, so landlords in Hurlstone Park face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Caringbah South is the bigger suburb, with a population of 13,168 against 5,001, roughly 2.6 times the size of Hurlstone Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Caringbah South for rental income, Hurlstone Park for recent price momentum, Hurlstone Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison