Skip to main content

Carlingford vs Strathfield South

Property investment comparison - Carlingford, NSW 2118 vs Strathfield South, NSW 2136

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Carlingford wins 3, Strathfield South wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCarlingfordStrathfield South
Median house price$2.3M$2.3M
Median unit price$735K$725K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.14%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.13%-
1-year house growth+2.9%estimate+0.6%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.6%2.1%
Population28,0443,636

Carlingford vs Strathfield South: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.3M in Carlingford and $2.3M in Strathfield South, so Carlingford is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Carlingford sits at a median of $735K against $725K in Strathfield South, which makes Strathfield South the more affordable unit market and Carlingford the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +2.9% in Carlingford (an estimate) and +0.6% in Strathfield South (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Carlingford, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Carlingford and 2.1% in Strathfield South, so landlords in Carlingford face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Carlingford is the bigger suburb, with a population of 28,044 against 3,636, roughly 8 times the size of Strathfield South; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Carlingford for a lower purchase price, Carlingford for recent price momentum, Carlingford for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison