Carlton vs Moorilim
Property investment comparison - Carlton, VIC 3053 vs Moorilim, VIC 3610
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Carlton wins 3, Moorilim wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Carlton | Moorilim |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.4M | $1.4M |
| Median unit price | - | $455K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.60% | 1.78% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 7.16% | 4.60% |
| 1-year house growth | -1.5% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -15.8% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.1% | 3.9% |
| Population | 16,055 | 25 |
Carlton vs Moorilim: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.4M in Carlton and $1.4M in Moorilim, so Moorilim is the cheaper entry point.
On cash flow, Carlton leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.60%, compared with 1.78% in Moorilim, a gap of 1.82 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Carlton and 3.9% in Moorilim, so landlords in Carlton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Carlton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 16,055 against 25, roughly 642 times the size of Moorilim; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Carlton for rental income, Moorilim for a lower purchase price, Carlton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison