Skip to main content

Carlyle vs Venus Bay

Property investment comparison - Carlyle, VIC 3687 vs Venus Bay, VIC 3956

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Carlyle wins 4, Venus Bay wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCarlyleVenus Bay
Median house price$480K$490K
Median unit price$320K$495K
Gross rental yield (houses)6.66%4.33%
Gross rental yield (units)5.62%2.49%
1-year house growth-9.8%estimate+0.9%
3-year house growth--30.0%
Vacancy rate2.0%1.1%
Population82904

Carlyle vs Venus Bay: what the numbers say

The median house price is $480K in Carlyle and $490K in Venus Bay, so Carlyle is the cheaper entry point, with Venus Bay houses about 2% dearer.

For units, Carlyle sits at a median of $320K against $495K in Venus Bay, which makes Carlyle the more affordable unit market and Venus Bay the pricier one.

On cash flow, Carlyle leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 6.66%, compared with 4.33% in Venus Bay, a gap of 2.33 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved -9.8% in Carlyle (an estimate) and +0.9% in Venus Bay, so recent momentum favours Venus Bay, while Carlyle went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Venus Bay and 2.0% in Carlyle, so landlords in Venus Bay face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Venus Bay is the bigger suburb, with a population of 904 against 82, roughly 11 times the size of Carlyle; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Carlyle for rental income, Carlyle for a lower purchase price, Venus Bay for recent price momentum, Venus Bay for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison