Skip to main content

Carnes Hill vs Rouse Hill

Property investment comparison - Carnes Hill, NSW 2171 vs Rouse Hill, NSW 2155

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Carnes Hill wins 2, Rouse Hill wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCarnes HillRouse Hill
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price$885K$665K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.20%
Gross rental yield (units)4.16%5.22%
1-year house growth+0.1%+3.8%
3-year house growth+18.3%+12.4%
Vacancy rate2.4%2.4%
Population3,33211,349

Carnes Hill vs Rouse Hill: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.4M in Carnes Hill and $1.4M in Rouse Hill, so Carnes Hill is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Carnes Hill sits at a median of $885K against $665K in Rouse Hill, which makes Rouse Hill the more affordable unit market and Carnes Hill the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +0.1% in Carnes Hill and +3.8% in Rouse Hill, so recent momentum favours Rouse Hill, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Carnes Hill houses are +18.3% and Rouse Hill houses +12.4%, so Carnes Hill has compounded faster than Rouse Hill over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 2.4%.

Rouse Hill is the bigger suburb, with a population of 11,349 against 3,332, roughly 3.4 times the size of Carnes Hill; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Carnes Hill for a lower purchase price, Rouse Hill for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison