Skip to main content

Carrara vs Seventeen Mile Rocks

Property investment comparison - Carrara, QLD 4211 vs Seventeen Mile Rocks, QLD 4073

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Carrara wins 1, Seventeen Mile Rocks wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCarraraSeventeen Mile Rocks
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$915K-
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.16%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.34%
1-year house growth+13.8%+9.0%
3-year house growth+44.3%+58.3%
Vacancy rate1.5%0.8%
Population13,1382,699

Carrara vs Seventeen Mile Rocks: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.3M in Carrara and $1.3M in Seventeen Mile Rocks, so Seventeen Mile Rocks is the cheaper entry point.

Over the past year house prices moved +13.8% in Carrara and +9.0% in Seventeen Mile Rocks, so recent momentum favours Carrara, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Carrara houses are +44.3% and Seventeen Mile Rocks houses +58.3%, so Seventeen Mile Rocks has compounded faster than Carrara over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Seventeen Mile Rocks and 1.5% in Carrara, so landlords in Seventeen Mile Rocks face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Carrara is the bigger suburb, with a population of 13,138 against 2,699, roughly 4.9 times the size of Seventeen Mile Rocks; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Seventeen Mile Rocks for a lower purchase price, Carrara for recent price momentum, Seventeen Mile Rocks for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison