Carrick vs Hamilton East
Property investment comparison - Carrick, NSW 2580 vs Hamilton East, NSW 2303
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Carrick wins 3, Hamilton East wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Carrick | Hamilton East |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2.0M | $2M |
| Median unit price | $565K | $650K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 2.34% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.38% | 4.24% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +3.6% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +13.2% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.2% | 1.3% |
| Population | 164 | 997 |
Carrick vs Hamilton East: what the numbers say
The median house price is $2.0M in Carrick and $2M in Hamilton East, so Hamilton East is the cheaper entry point.
For units, Carrick sits at a median of $565K against $650K in Hamilton East, which makes Carrick the more affordable unit market and Hamilton East the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Carrick and 1.3% in Hamilton East, so landlords in Carrick face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Hamilton East is the bigger suburb, with a population of 997 against 164, roughly 6 times the size of Carrick; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Hamilton East for a lower purchase price, Carrick for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison