Carrick vs Mascot
Property investment comparison - Carrick, NSW 2580 vs Mascot, NSW 2020
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Carrick wins 2, Mascot wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Carrick | Mascot |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2.0M | $2.0M |
| Median unit price | $565K | $900K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 2.95% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.38% | 5.78% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +5.0% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +2.2% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.2% | 2.4% |
| Population | 164 | 21,591 |
Carrick vs Mascot: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $2.0M in Carrick and $2.0M in Mascot.
For units, Carrick sits at a median of $565K against $900K in Mascot, which makes Carrick the more affordable unit market and Mascot the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Carrick and 2.4% in Mascot, so landlords in Carrick face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Mascot is the bigger suburb, with a population of 21,591 against 164, roughly 132 times the size of Carrick; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Carrick for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison