Skip to main content

Carrum vs Clematis

Property investment comparison - Carrum, VIC 3197 vs Clematis, VIC 3782

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Carrum wins 3, Clematis wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCarrumClematis
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$830K$825K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.33%3.18%
Gross rental yield (units)4.20%3.35%
1-year house growth+8.9%-
3-year house growth+4.6%-
Vacancy rate1.2%2.8%
Population4,239352

Carrum vs Clematis: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Carrum and $1.1M in Clematis, so Clematis is the cheaper entry point, with Carrum houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Carrum sits at a median of $830K against $825K in Clematis, which makes Clematis the more affordable unit market and Carrum the pricier one.

On cash flow, Carrum leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.33%, compared with 3.18% in Clematis, a gap of 0.15 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Carrum and 2.8% in Clematis, so landlords in Carrum face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Carrum is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,239 against 352, roughly 12 times the size of Clematis; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Carrum for rental income, Clematis for a lower purchase price, Carrum for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison