Skip to main content

Carrum vs Macedon

Property investment comparison - Carrum, VIC 3197 vs Macedon, VIC 3440

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Carrum wins 4, Macedon wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCarrumMacedon
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$830K$840K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.33%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.20%2.17%
1-year house growth+8.9%+3.6%estimate
3-year house growth+4.6%-
Vacancy rate1.2%4.5%
Population4,2392,073

Carrum vs Macedon: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Carrum and $1.1M in Macedon, so Macedon is the cheaper entry point, with Carrum houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Carrum sits at a median of $830K against $840K in Macedon, which makes Carrum the more affordable unit market and Macedon the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.9% in Carrum and +3.6% in Macedon (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Carrum, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Carrum and 4.5% in Macedon, so landlords in Carrum face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Carrum is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,239 against 2,073, roughly 2.0 times the size of Macedon; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Macedon for a lower purchase price, Carrum for recent price momentum, Carrum for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison