Skip to main content

Carrum vs Mount Lonarch

Property investment comparison - Carrum, VIC 3197 vs Mount Lonarch, VIC 3468

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Carrum wins 2, Mount Lonarch wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCarrumMount Lonarch
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$830K$95K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.33%1.70%
Gross rental yield (units)4.20%9.45%
1-year house growth+8.9%-
3-year house growth+4.6%-
Vacancy rate1.2%4.7%
Population4,23944

Carrum vs Mount Lonarch: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Carrum and $1.1M in Mount Lonarch.

For units, Carrum sits at a median of $830K against $95K in Mount Lonarch, which makes Mount Lonarch the more affordable unit market and Carrum the pricier one.

On cash flow, Carrum leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.33%, compared with 1.70% in Mount Lonarch, a gap of 1.63 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Carrum and 4.7% in Mount Lonarch, so landlords in Carrum face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Carrum is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,239 against 44, roughly 96 times the size of Mount Lonarch; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Carrum for rental income, Carrum for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Carrum vs Mount Lonarch: Suburb Comparison 2026