Carrum vs Tylden
Property investment comparison - Carrum, VIC 3197 vs Tylden, VIC 3444
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Carrum wins 3, Tylden wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Carrum | Tylden |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.1M | $1.1M |
| Median unit price | $830K | $660K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.33% | 2.12% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.20% | 3.72% |
| 1-year house growth | +8.9% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +4.6% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.2% | 2.8% |
| Population | 4,239 | 645 |
Carrum vs Tylden: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Carrum and $1.1M in Tylden.
For units, Carrum sits at a median of $830K against $660K in Tylden, which makes Tylden the more affordable unit market and Carrum the pricier one.
On cash flow, Carrum leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.33%, compared with 2.12% in Tylden, a gap of 1.21 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Carrum and 2.8% in Tylden, so landlords in Carrum face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Carrum is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,239 against 645, roughly 7 times the size of Tylden; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Carrum for rental income, Carrum for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison