Skip to main content

Cartwright vs Rankin Park

Property investment comparison - Cartwright, NSW 2168 vs Rankin Park, NSW 2287

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cartwright wins 2, Rankin Park wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCartwrightRankin Park
Median house price$990K$990K
Median unit price$905K$665K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.96%
Gross rental yield (units)3.52%4.56%
1-year house growth+13.5%+8.8%estimate
3-year house growth+25.5%-
Vacancy rate0.8%2.5%
Population2,6162,547

Cartwright vs Rankin Park: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $990K in Cartwright and $990K in Rankin Park.

For units, Cartwright sits at a median of $905K against $665K in Rankin Park, which makes Rankin Park the more affordable unit market and Cartwright the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +13.5% in Cartwright and +8.8% in Rankin Park (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Cartwright, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Cartwright and 2.5% in Rankin Park, so landlords in Cartwright face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Cartwright is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,616 against 2,547, larger than Rankin Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Cartwright for recent price momentum, Cartwright for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison