Skip to main content

Castlemaine vs Delahey

Property investment comparison - Castlemaine, VIC 3450 vs Delahey, VIC 3037

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Castlemaine wins 2, Delahey wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCastlemaineDelahey
Median house price$745K$745K
Median unit price$570K$610K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.51%
Gross rental yield (units)3.66%3.97%
1-year house growth+2.0%+12.6%
3-year house growth-1.0%+15.8%
Vacancy rate0.8%1.5%
Population7,5068,077

Castlemaine vs Delahey: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $745K in Castlemaine and $745K in Delahey.

For units, Castlemaine sits at a median of $570K against $610K in Delahey, which makes Castlemaine the more affordable unit market and Delahey the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +2.0% in Castlemaine and +12.6% in Delahey, so recent momentum favours Delahey, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Castlemaine houses are -1.0% and Delahey houses +15.8%, so Delahey has compounded faster than Castlemaine over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Castlemaine and 1.5% in Delahey, so landlords in Castlemaine face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Delahey is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,077 against 7,506, larger than Castlemaine; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Delahey for recent price momentum, Castlemaine for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison