Skip to main content

Casuarina vs Lewisham

Property investment comparison - Casuarina, NSW 2487 vs Lewisham, NSW 2049

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Casuarina wins 2, Lewisham wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCasuarinaLewisham
Median house price$2.4M$2.4M
Median unit price$1.1M$820K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.25%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.02%4.59%
1-year house growth+9.3%+8.0%
3-year house growth+13.6%+17.4%
Vacancy rate3.5%1.9%
Population3,2564,060

Casuarina vs Lewisham: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.4M in Casuarina and $2.4M in Lewisham, so Casuarina is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Casuarina sits at a median of $1.1M against $820K in Lewisham, which makes Lewisham the more affordable unit market and Casuarina the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.3% in Casuarina and +8.0% in Lewisham, so recent momentum favours Casuarina, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Casuarina houses are +13.6% and Lewisham houses +17.4%, so Lewisham has compounded faster than Casuarina over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Lewisham and 3.5% in Casuarina, so landlords in Lewisham face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Lewisham is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,060 against 3,256, larger than Casuarina; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Casuarina for a lower purchase price, Casuarina for recent price momentum, Lewisham for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison