Skip to main content

Catalina vs Telarah

Property investment comparison - Catalina, NSW 2536 vs Telarah, NSW 2320

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Catalina wins 2, Telarah wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCatalinaTelarah
Median house price$725K$730K
Median unit price-$360K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.20%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.15%8.64%
1-year house growth+5.6%+12.7%
3-year house growth+4.9%+18.6%
Vacancy rate1.3%1.4%
Population2,5222,318

Catalina vs Telarah: what the numbers say

The median house price is $725K in Catalina and $730K in Telarah, so Catalina is the cheaper entry point, with Telarah houses about 1% dearer.

Over the past year house prices moved +5.6% in Catalina and +12.7% in Telarah, so recent momentum favours Telarah, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Catalina houses are +4.9% and Telarah houses +18.6%, so Telarah has compounded faster than Catalina over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Catalina and 1.4% in Telarah, so landlords in Catalina face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Catalina is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,522 against 2,318, larger than Telarah; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Catalina for a lower purchase price, Telarah for recent price momentum, Catalina for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison