Skip to main content

Catani vs Notting Hill

Property investment comparison - Catani, VIC 3981 vs Notting Hill, VIC 3168

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Catani wins 2, Notting Hill wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCataniNotting Hill
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$335K$435K
Gross rental yield (houses)1.72%2.82%
Gross rental yield (units)5.29%7.50%
1-year house growth-+0.7%
3-year house growth-+8.5%
Vacancy rate0.4%1.9%
Population2972,895

Catani vs Notting Hill: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.2M in Catani and $1.2M in Notting Hill.

For units, Catani sits at a median of $335K against $435K in Notting Hill, which makes Catani the more affordable unit market and Notting Hill the pricier one.

On cash flow, Notting Hill leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.82%, compared with 1.72% in Catani, a gap of 1.10 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Catani and 1.9% in Notting Hill, so landlords in Catani face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Notting Hill is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,895 against 297, roughly 10 times the size of Catani; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Notting Hill for rental income, Catani for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison