Cathcart vs Port Fairy
Property investment comparison - Cathcart, VIC 3377 vs Port Fairy, VIC 3284
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cathcart wins 1, Port Fairy wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Cathcart | Port Fairy |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $855K | $860K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.27% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 2.97% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +11.8% |
| 3-year house growth | - | -5.8% |
| Vacancy rate | 2.2% | 0.8% |
| Population | 110 | 3,742 |
Cathcart vs Port Fairy: what the numbers say
The median house price is $855K in Cathcart and $860K in Port Fairy, so Cathcart is the cheaper entry point, with Port Fairy houses about 1% dearer.
Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Port Fairy and 2.2% in Cathcart, so landlords in Port Fairy face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Port Fairy is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,742 against 110, roughly 34 times the size of Cathcart; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Cathcart for a lower purchase price, Port Fairy for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison