Skip to main content

Catherine Field vs Figtree

Property investment comparison - Catherine Field, NSW 2557 vs Figtree, NSW 2525

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Catherine Field wins 1, Figtree wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCatherine FieldFigtree
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$900K$785K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.26%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.70%-
1-year house growth+16.8%+7.4%estimate
3-year house growth+15.5%-
Vacancy rate2.1%2.0%
Population2,60912,335

Catherine Field vs Figtree: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.2M in Catherine Field and $1.2M in Figtree, so Figtree is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Catherine Field sits at a median of $900K against $785K in Figtree, which makes Figtree the more affordable unit market and Catherine Field the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +16.8% in Catherine Field and +7.4% in Figtree (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Catherine Field, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 2.0% in Figtree and 2.1% in Catherine Field, so landlords in Figtree face less competition for tenants.

Figtree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,335 against 2,609, roughly 4.7 times the size of Catherine Field; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Figtree for a lower purchase price, Catherine Field for recent price momentum, Figtree for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison