Skip to main content

Caulfield East vs Templestowe

Property investment comparison - Caulfield East, VIC 3145 vs Templestowe, VIC 3106

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Caulfield East wins 4, Templestowe wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCaulfield EastTemplestowe
Median house price$1.6M$1.6M
Median unit price$370K$970K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.83%-
Gross rental yield (units)6.11%-
1-year house growth+0.4%-5.6%estimate
3-year house growth+10.2%-
Vacancy rate1.0%2.3%
Population1,29316,966

Caulfield East vs Templestowe: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.6M in Caulfield East and $1.6M in Templestowe, so Caulfield East is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Caulfield East sits at a median of $370K against $970K in Templestowe, which makes Caulfield East the more affordable unit market and Templestowe the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +0.4% in Caulfield East and -5.6% in Templestowe (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Caulfield East, while Templestowe went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Caulfield East and 2.3% in Templestowe, so landlords in Caulfield East face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Templestowe is the bigger suburb, with a population of 16,966 against 1,293, roughly 13 times the size of Caulfield East; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Caulfield East for a lower purchase price, Caulfield East for recent price momentum, Caulfield East for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison