Cawdor vs Mayfield
Property investment comparison - Cawdor, NSW 2570 vs Mayfield, NSW 2304
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cawdor wins 3, Mayfield wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Cawdor | Mayfield |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.1M | $1.1M |
| Median unit price | $715K | $830K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.70% | 3.47% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.09% | - |
| 1-year house growth | - | +10.5% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +27.7% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.9% | 1.1% |
| Population | 430 | 9,760 |
Cawdor vs Mayfield: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.1M in Cawdor and $1.1M in Mayfield, so Mayfield is the cheaper entry point.
For units, Cawdor sits at a median of $715K against $830K in Mayfield, which makes Cawdor the more affordable unit market and Mayfield the pricier one.
On cash flow, Cawdor leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.70%, compared with 3.47% in Mayfield, a gap of 0.23 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Cawdor and 1.1% in Mayfield, so landlords in Cawdor face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Mayfield is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,760 against 430, roughly 23 times the size of Cawdor; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Cawdor for rental income, Mayfield for a lower purchase price, Cawdor for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison