Skip to main content

Cedar Vale vs Victoria Point

Property investment comparison - Cedar Vale, QLD 4285 vs Victoria Point, QLD 4165

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cedar Vale wins 2, Victoria Point wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCedar ValeVictoria Point
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$2.8M$805K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.09%-
Gross rental yield (units)--
1-year house growth+17.8%estimate+13.0%
3-year house growth-+41.9%
Vacancy rate0.8%1.0%
Population2,85615,140

Cedar Vale vs Victoria Point: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Cedar Vale and $1.1M in Victoria Point, so Victoria Point is the cheaper entry point, with Cedar Vale houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Cedar Vale sits at a median of $2.8M against $805K in Victoria Point, which makes Victoria Point the more affordable unit market and Cedar Vale the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.8% in Cedar Vale (an estimate) and +13.0% in Victoria Point, so recent momentum favours Cedar Vale, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Cedar Vale and 1.0% in Victoria Point, so landlords in Cedar Vale face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Victoria Point is the bigger suburb, with a population of 15,140 against 2,856, roughly 5 times the size of Cedar Vale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Victoria Point for a lower purchase price, Cedar Vale for recent price momentum, Cedar Vale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison