Skip to main content

Chapel Hill vs Wavell Heights

Property investment comparison - Chapel Hill, QLD 4069 vs Wavell Heights, QLD 4012

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Chapel Hill wins 0, Wavell Heights wins 5. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricChapel HillWavell Heights
Median house price$1.7M$1.6M
Median unit price$1.6M$800K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.10%-
Gross rental yield (units)2.98%4.05%
1-year house growth+6.4%estimate+11.3%
3-year house growth-+37.1%
Vacancy rate1.9%1.4%
Population10,51110,336

Chapel Hill vs Wavell Heights: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.7M in Chapel Hill and $1.6M in Wavell Heights, so Wavell Heights is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Chapel Hill sits at a median of $1.6M against $800K in Wavell Heights, which makes Wavell Heights the more affordable unit market and Chapel Hill the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.4% in Chapel Hill (an estimate) and +11.3% in Wavell Heights, so recent momentum favours Wavell Heights, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Wavell Heights and 1.9% in Chapel Hill, so landlords in Wavell Heights face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Chapel Hill is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,511 against 10,336, larger than Wavell Heights; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Wavell Heights for a lower purchase price, Wavell Heights for recent price momentum, Wavell Heights for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Chapel Hill vs Wavell Heights: Suburb Comparison 2026