Charlemont vs Ercildoune
Property investment comparison - Charlemont, VIC 3217 vs Ercildoune, VIC 3352
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Charlemont wins 1, Ercildoune wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Charlemont | Ercildoune |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $645K | $645K |
| Median unit price | $475K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.20% | 4.05% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.67% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +2.5% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +4.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.4% | 1.7% |
| Population | 2,612 | 90 |
Charlemont vs Ercildoune: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $645K in Charlemont and $645K in Ercildoune.
On cash flow, Charlemont leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.20%, compared with 4.05% in Ercildoune, a gap of 0.15 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.7% in Ercildoune and 2.4% in Charlemont, so landlords in Ercildoune face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Charlemont is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,612 against 90, roughly 29 times the size of Ercildoune; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Charlemont for rental income, Ercildoune for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison