Skip to main content

Charlemont vs Graytown

Property investment comparison - Charlemont, VIC 3217 vs Graytown, VIC 3608

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Charlemont wins 0, Graytown wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCharlemontGraytown
Median house price$645K$640K
Median unit price$475K$345K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.20%4.38%
Gross rental yield (units)2.67%-
1-year house growth+2.5%-
3-year house growth+4.9%-
Vacancy rate2.4%1.3%
Population2,61260

Charlemont vs Graytown: what the numbers say

The median house price is $645K in Charlemont and $640K in Graytown, so Graytown is the cheaper entry point, with Charlemont houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Charlemont sits at a median of $475K against $345K in Graytown, which makes Graytown the more affordable unit market and Charlemont the pricier one.

On cash flow, Graytown leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.38%, compared with 4.20% in Charlemont, a gap of 0.18 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Graytown and 2.4% in Charlemont, so landlords in Graytown face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Charlemont is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,612 against 60, roughly 44 times the size of Graytown; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Graytown for rental income, Graytown for a lower purchase price, Graytown for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison