Skip to main content

Charlemont vs Great Western

Property investment comparison - Charlemont, VIC 3217 vs Great Western, VIC 3374

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Charlemont wins 2, Great Western wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCharlemontGreat Western
Median house price$645K$645K
Median unit price$475K$215K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.20%3.00%
Gross rental yield (units)2.67%-
1-year house growth+2.5%-
3-year house growth+4.9%-
Vacancy rate2.4%4.0%
Population2,612425

Charlemont vs Great Western: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $645K in Charlemont and $645K in Great Western.

For units, Charlemont sits at a median of $475K against $215K in Great Western, which makes Great Western the more affordable unit market and Charlemont the pricier one.

On cash flow, Charlemont leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.20%, compared with 3.00% in Great Western, a gap of 1.20 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 2.4% in Charlemont and 4.0% in Great Western, so landlords in Charlemont face less competition for tenants.

Charlemont is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,612 against 425, roughly 6 times the size of Great Western; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Charlemont for rental income, Charlemont for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison