Skip to main content

Charlemont vs Naringal

Property investment comparison - Charlemont, VIC 3217 vs Naringal, VIC 3277

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Charlemont wins 1, Naringal wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCharlemontNaringal
Median house price$645K$645K
Median unit price$475K$725K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.20%4.35%
Gross rental yield (units)2.67%3.16%
1-year house growth+2.5%-
3-year house growth+4.9%-
Vacancy rate2.4%1.6%
Population2,612124

Charlemont vs Naringal: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $645K in Charlemont and $645K in Naringal.

For units, Charlemont sits at a median of $475K against $725K in Naringal, which makes Charlemont the more affordable unit market and Naringal the pricier one.

On cash flow, Naringal leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.35%, compared with 4.20% in Charlemont, a gap of 0.15 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Naringal and 2.4% in Charlemont, so landlords in Naringal face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Charlemont is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,612 against 124, roughly 21 times the size of Naringal; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Naringal for rental income, Naringal for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison