Skip to main content

Charlestown vs Korora

Property investment comparison - Charlestown, NSW 2290 vs Korora, NSW 2450

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Charlestown wins 3, Korora wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCharlestownKorora
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$730K$770K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.50%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.46%-
1-year house growth+14.9%+0.8%estimate
3-year house growth+24.0%-
Vacancy rate1.9%2.5%
Population13,6012,740

Charlestown vs Korora: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Charlestown and $1.1M in Korora.

For units, Charlestown sits at a median of $730K against $770K in Korora, which makes Charlestown the more affordable unit market and Korora the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.9% in Charlestown and +0.8% in Korora (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Charlestown, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Charlestown and 2.5% in Korora, so landlords in Charlestown face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Charlestown is the bigger suburb, with a population of 13,601 against 2,740, roughly 5.0 times the size of Korora; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Charlestown for recent price momentum, Charlestown for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison