Skip to main content

Charlestown vs Phegans Bay

Property investment comparison - Charlestown, NSW 2290 vs Phegans Bay, NSW 2256

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Charlestown wins 3, Phegans Bay wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCharlestownPhegans Bay
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$730K$690K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.50%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.46%4.27%
1-year house growth+14.9%+9.5%
3-year house growth+24.0%-
Vacancy rate1.9%2.5%
Population13,601406

Charlestown vs Phegans Bay: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Charlestown and $1.1M in Phegans Bay, so Phegans Bay is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Charlestown sits at a median of $730K against $690K in Phegans Bay, which makes Phegans Bay the more affordable unit market and Charlestown the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.9% in Charlestown and +9.5% in Phegans Bay, so recent momentum favours Charlestown, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Charlestown and 2.5% in Phegans Bay, so landlords in Charlestown face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Charlestown is the bigger suburb, with a population of 13,601 against 406, roughly 34 times the size of Phegans Bay; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Phegans Bay for a lower purchase price, Charlestown for recent price momentum, Charlestown for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison