Skip to main content

Charlestown vs Wyee

Property investment comparison - Charlestown, NSW 2290 vs Wyee, NSW 2259

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Charlestown wins 1, Wyee wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCharlestownWyee
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$730K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.50%3.50%
Gross rental yield (units)4.46%5.09%
1-year house growth+14.9%+17.9%estimate
3-year house growth+24.0%-
Vacancy rate1.9%1.4%
Population13,6012,909

Charlestown vs Wyee: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Charlestown and $1.1M in Wyee, so Charlestown is the cheaper entry point.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.50% in Charlestown and 3.50% in Wyee, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.9% in Charlestown and +17.9% in Wyee (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Wyee, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Wyee and 1.9% in Charlestown, so landlords in Wyee face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Charlestown is the bigger suburb, with a population of 13,601 against 2,909, roughly 4.7 times the size of Wyee; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Charlestown for a lower purchase price, Wyee for recent price momentum, Wyee for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Charlestown vs Wyee: Property Investment Comparison (2026)