Charleville vs Gundiah
Property investment comparison - Charleville, QLD 4470 vs Gundiah, QLD 4650
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Charleville wins 1, Gundiah wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Charleville | Gundiah |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $230K | $230K |
| Median unit price | $305K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.81% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.97% | - |
| 1-year house growth | - | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.5% | 1.1% |
| Population | 2,992 | 89 |
Charleville vs Gundiah: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $230K in Charleville and $230K in Gundiah.
Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Charleville and 1.1% in Gundiah, so landlords in Charleville face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Charleville is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,992 against 89, roughly 34 times the size of Gundiah; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Charleville for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison