Charlton vs Wallup
Property investment comparison - Charlton, VIC 3525 vs Wallup, VIC 3401
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Charlton wins 1, Wallup wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Charlton | Wallup |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $330K | $330K |
| Median unit price | $330K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 6.95% | 5.91% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.49% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +8.2% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +0.0% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.7% | - |
| Population | 1,095 | 28 |
Charlton vs Wallup: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $330K in Charlton and $330K in Wallup.
On cash flow, Charlton leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 6.95%, compared with 5.91% in Wallup, a gap of 1.04 percentage points.
Charlton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,095 against 28, roughly 39 times the size of Wallup; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Charlton for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison