Chatsworth vs Kerang
Property investment comparison - Chatsworth, VIC 3379 vs Kerang, VIC 3579
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Chatsworth wins 2, Kerang wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Chatsworth | Kerang |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $320K | $330K |
| Median unit price | - | $220K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 6.83% | 5.84% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 5.20% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +9.4%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.6% | 0.7% |
| Population | 49 | 3,960 |
Chatsworth vs Kerang: what the numbers say
The median house price is $320K in Chatsworth and $330K in Kerang, so Chatsworth is the cheaper entry point, with Kerang houses about 3% dearer.
On cash flow, Chatsworth leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 6.83%, compared with 5.84% in Kerang, a gap of 0.99 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Kerang and 2.6% in Chatsworth, so landlords in Kerang face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Kerang is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,960 against 49, roughly 81 times the size of Chatsworth; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Chatsworth for rental income, Chatsworth for a lower purchase price, Kerang for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison