Chelona vs Wondai
Property investment comparison - Chelona, QLD 4740 vs Wondai, QLD 4606
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Chelona wins 1, Wondai wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Chelona | Wondai |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $500K | $500K |
| Median unit price | - | $610K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 7.40% | 4.68% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 2.82% |
| 1-year house growth | - | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | +49.2% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.3% | 0.7% |
| Population | 120 | 1,975 |
Chelona vs Wondai: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $500K in Chelona and $500K in Wondai.
On cash flow, Chelona leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 7.40%, compared with 4.68% in Wondai, a gap of 2.72 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Wondai and 1.3% in Chelona, so landlords in Wondai face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Wondai is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,975 against 120, roughly 16 times the size of Chelona; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Chelona for rental income, Wondai for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison