Chetwynd vs Dimboola
Property investment comparison - Chetwynd, VIC 3312 vs Dimboola, VIC 3414
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Chetwynd wins 0, Dimboola wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Chetwynd | Dimboola |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $320K | $320K |
| Median unit price | - | $350K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.10% | 5.91% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.41% |
| 1-year house growth | - | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | +12.1% |
| Vacancy rate | - | 0.4% |
| Population | 85 | 1,635 |
Chetwynd vs Dimboola: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $320K in Chetwynd and $320K in Dimboola.
On cash flow, Dimboola leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.91%, compared with 5.10% in Chetwynd, a gap of 0.81 percentage points.
Dimboola is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,635 against 85, roughly 19 times the size of Chetwynd; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Dimboola for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison