Chetwynd vs Edenhope
Property investment comparison - Chetwynd, VIC 3312 vs Edenhope, VIC 3318
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Chetwynd wins 0, Edenhope wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Chetwynd | Edenhope |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $320K | $320K |
| Median unit price | - | $340K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.10% | 6.30% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 3.57% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +3.4%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | - | 0.8% |
| Population | 85 | 937 |
Chetwynd vs Edenhope: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $320K in Chetwynd and $320K in Edenhope.
On cash flow, Edenhope leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 6.30%, compared with 5.10% in Chetwynd, a gap of 1.20 percentage points.
Edenhope is the bigger suburb, with a population of 937 against 85, roughly 11 times the size of Chetwynd; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Edenhope for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison