Chetwynd vs Kerang
Property investment comparison - Chetwynd, VIC 3312 vs Kerang, VIC 3579
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Chetwynd wins 1, Kerang wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Chetwynd | Kerang |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $320K | $330K |
| Median unit price | - | $220K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.10% | 5.84% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 5.20% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +9.4%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | - | 0.7% |
| Population | 85 | 3,960 |
Chetwynd vs Kerang: what the numbers say
The median house price is $320K in Chetwynd and $330K in Kerang, so Chetwynd is the cheaper entry point, with Kerang houses about 3% dearer.
On cash flow, Kerang leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.84%, compared with 5.10% in Chetwynd, a gap of 0.74 percentage points.
Kerang is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,960 against 85, roughly 47 times the size of Chetwynd; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Kerang for rental income, Chetwynd for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison